Wood chopped! Grenon cuts down Michael Wood’s ‘clumsy deception’ on NZME board shake-up




Michael Wood’s attempt to paint businessman Jim Grenon as a threat to editorial independence met the axe.

In an ongoing exchange over NZME’s future, Grenon dismissed accusations from the former Labour minister, calling them a “clumsy deception” designed to mislead.

“I note the union has changed what it actually said in my release… That is just clumsy deception,” Grenon said, pointing out how Wood and the E tū union misrepresented his intentions.

Grenon, who holds nearly 10% of NZME shares, has gained further backing in his push for board changes. NZME’s largest shareholder, Australian-based Spheria Asset Management, has now confirmed its support, stating that “maintaining the status quo is not an option.”

Spheria’s Matt Booker noted NZME’s financial performance has declined sharply in recent years and said Grenon’s nominees would help strengthen the company’s direction.

Meanwhile, NZME chair Barbara Chapman maintains that the company is “performing strongly” and that the board renewal process must be “structured and deliberate.” The upcoming April 29 shareholders meeting will give investors a chance to determine the company’s path forward.

Wood’s criticism comes despite his own past controversies over transparency. The former minister was forced to resign after failing to disclose shareholdings in Auckland Airport and other companies.

Grenon noted, “Being portrayed as a cartoon villain lacking transparency on shareholdings… I would note the irony of being lectured by Michael on that particular point.”

Centrist Ltd.

Advertisement

read more…

‘It is hard to work in US politics and be free of Zionism’ – Calla Walsh

Canterbury 3D-Printed Firearms Raid Raises New Questions About Public Safety

Canterbury 3D-Printed Firearms Raid Raises New Questions About Public Safety

What Trade-Off Could Trump’s Grand Deal Between Putin & Zelensky Realistically Entail?

Opinion by Andrew Korybko

WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH GETS WEAPONISED

Brian Tamaki's reported exclusion from Australia raises difficult questions about free expression, public safety and government power.

Scott Watson Supreme Court Appeal: When Does Overwhelming Evidence Become a Miscarriage of Justice?

Crown defends murder convictions as disputed photo identification returns to the centre of legal scrutiny

share article

or copy this link: