Supreme Court rules Uber drivers are employees, raising concerns over worker choice and future of contracting




New Zealand’s Supreme Court has ruled that four Uber drivers who challenged their status are employees, not contractors.


The ruling applies only to the four drivers who brought the case, but it opens the door for thousands of contractors with a single dominant platform or employer to argue they are, in fact, employees entitled to minimum wage, guaranteed hours, paid leave, and the right to bring personal grievances.

The case stems from a 2022 Employment Court ruling. Uber appealed all the way to the top court, arguing its platform simply connects riders and independent drivers who run their own small businesses. The Supreme Court unanimously rejected that position, finding that in practice Uber “engages drivers to deliver passenger transport services” and exerts significant control over how those services are provided.

The court acknowledged drivers can choose their hours, work for competitors, and own their vehicles. But it said those freedoms were outweighed by the level of integration and control built into Uber’s systems, pricing, ratings, and performance management tools. It concluded that passengers “could not reasonably be expected to think they were contracting with the driver” rather than Uber itself.

Uber New Zealand said General manager Emma Foley said independent contracting is “a cornerstone” of the wider economy and valued by “hundreds of thousands of Kiwis” who rely on flexible work to fit around study, caregiving, or other jobs.

Centrist Ltd.

Advertisement

read more…

Putin, Trump and Xi: Historic Three-Way Summit Could Reshape Global Diplomacy

Kremlin signals potential November meeting between the world's three major powers

Canterbury 3D-Printed Firearms Raid Raises New Questions About Public Safety

Canterbury 3D-Printed Firearms Raid Raises New Questions About Public Safety

The Netherlands Case: The Allegations That Could Shake the Foundations of the COVID Era

A Dutch courtroom confronts claims of deliberate harm, military coordination and institutional deception. What would justice mean for New Zealand?

Scott Watson Supreme Court Appeal: When Does Overwhelming Evidence Become a Miscarriage of Justice?

Crown defends murder convictions as disputed photo identification returns to the centre of legal scrutiny

‘It is hard to work in US politics and be free of Zionism’ – Calla Walsh

share article

or copy this link: