Almost half of Germans surveyed believe Chancellor Friedrich Merz will leave office before the end of 2026, as electoral setbacks, weak public approval and disputes over Germany’s economic direction intensify pressure on his government. But the poll measures public expectations, not whether Merz will actually be removed, and Germany’s constitutional system makes replacing a sitting chancellor considerably harder than the headline numbers suggest
INR Report: Based on reporting by RT HERE
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is facing a potentially defining political test just 16 months after taking office, with a new YouGov survey finding that 48% of Germans expect him to have left the chancellery before the end of 2026.
Only 31% of respondents expected Merz to remain Chancellor through the end of the year, while 21% were undecided.
The survey of 1,611 German adults was conducted on September 17.
The finding does not mean that 48% of Germans are demanding Merz's resignation, nor does it predict that he will leave office.
It measures something politically different: public expectations about whether his government can survive the mounting pressure surrounding it.
That pressure is real.
Merz's Christian Democratic Union has suffered damaging electoral setbacks, his personal approval has deteriorated, economic reforms have generated political resistance and the rapid rise of Alternative for Germany (AfD) is challenging the established political balance.
The result is that a government formed only last year is already confronting open discussion about whether its Chancellor will survive.
The Economic Picture Is More Complicated Than Recession
Germany's economic difficulties form an important part of the political backdrop, but the current position needs to be stated accurately.
The country experienced years of extremely weak economic performance, including recession and stagnation.
Germany's economy is now growing again.
Official figures from Germany's Federal Statistical Office show GDP increased 0.4% in the first quarter of 2026 and another 0.3% in the second quarter.
Compared with the second quarter of 2025, GDP was 1% higher.
That means Germany is not presently in recession.
But the underlying numbers also explain why many households and businesses may not yet feel that a meaningful recovery has arrived.
Private consumption increased just 0.1% year-on-year in the second quarter, while gross investment fell 1.3%.
Construction investment was down 1.5%.
Exports provided much of the improvement, rising 3.7% compared with the same quarter a year earlier.
Germany therefore has economic growth again, but the recovery remains uneven.
That distinction matters because political arguments describing Germany as simply remaining in recession overstate the current evidence.
The stronger criticism is that Europe's largest economy has emerged from years of stagnation without yet generating a broad domestic recovery strong enough to relieve political dissatisfaction.
Merz Promised Economic Transformation
Merz entered office promising to restore German economic competitiveness while strengthening Germany's leadership role within Europe.
His coalition has since struggled to agree on major domestic reforms.
In July, the government approved a 34-point economic package including tax changes, pension reform, tighter sick-leave provisions and spending restraint.
Those measures were presented as necessary structural reforms.
They also created political opposition.
Germany faces difficult long-term problems: an ageing population, high industrial energy costs, pressure on its manufacturing base, expensive social commitments, infrastructure requirements and increasing defence expenditure.
Solving those problems requires money.
But asking households and businesses to absorb reforms while simultaneously expanding military expenditure creates an obvious political tension.
Defence Has Become a Central Priority
Merz has placed German and European security at the centre of his government.
He has pledged to develop what he has called the "strongest conventional army in Europe" and argues that Russia represents a fundamental security threat requiring substantially greater European defence capability.
Moscow rejects that characterisation.
The important domestic issue is not simply whether Germany should strengthen its military.
It is the competition for national resources.
Every government operates within financial constraints.
Money devoted to defence cannot simultaneously be spent on infrastructure, pensions, tax reductions, healthcare, industrial subsidies or household assistance unless government revenue, borrowing or economic output increases accordingly.
Germany is therefore attempting two difficult transformations simultaneously: rebuilding economic competitiveness and dramatically expanding its security role.
Whether voters are prepared to accept the associated costs is becoming an increasingly important political question.
The AfD Has Changed the Political Equation
The greatest electoral pressure on Germany's traditional parties is coming from Alternative for Germany.
The AfD made major gains in the Saxony-Anhalt state election earlier this month, delivering another significant setback to Merz's CDU.
The result intensified an already difficult strategic problem.
Germany's established parties have maintained what is commonly called the Brandmauer, or firewall, under which they refuse coalition cooperation with the AfD.
That leaves the party politically isolated even as its electoral support increases.
The strategy creates an unusual democratic dynamic.
The larger the AfD becomes, the more difficult coalition formation becomes for the parties refusing to work with it.
That does not give the AfD an automatic route to government.
It does, however, mean that electoral gains by the party increasingly reshape the mathematics of governing Germany.
Merz therefore faces pressure from two directions: voters moving toward the AfD and political constraints preventing his CDU from using AfD support to construct governing majorities.
Another Electoral Test Arrives Immediately
Berlin and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania hold elections on Sunday.
Both have become politically important tests for Merz.
Further CDU losses would not constitutionally require his resignation.
State elections do not determine who serves as German Chancellor.
But repeated defeats can weaken a Chancellor's authority inside his own party and coalition.
That is why German media have increasingly discussed a possible Kanzlertausch, or "chancellor swap."
Reuters has independently reported growing pressure on Merz following recent electoral setbacks.
The political situation has become serious enough that Merz cancelled a planned trip to New York for the United Nations General Assembly.
A German government source told Reuters that his presence was required in Berlin.
Merz has also summoned CDU leaders to the capital as Sunday's results arrive.
These are not proof that his departure is imminent.
They are evidence that his domestic political problems are commanding the government's attention at the highest level.
Removing a German Chancellor Is Not Simple
There is another reason to treat predictions about Merz's departure cautiously.
Germany deliberately designed its post-war constitution to make governments difficult to overthrow without an alternative government ready to replace them.
Under Article 67 of Germany's Basic Law, the Bundestag cannot simply remove a Chancellor through an ordinary vote of no confidence.
It must elect a successor at the same time.
This is known as a constructive vote of no confidence.
The mechanism was designed to prevent the parliamentary instability that characterised parts of the Weimar Republic.
Merz could resign voluntarily.
He could also call a confidence vote himself.
But removing him against his will would require parliamentarians to agree not merely that Merz should go, but on who should replace him.
That is a substantially higher political threshold.
At present, there is no publicly established consensus candidate capable of commanding the necessary parliamentary majority.
The Poll Is a Warning, Not a Forecast
The YouGov result therefore needs careful interpretation.
Forty-eight percent believing Merz will leave office does not mean there is a 48% probability that he will do so.
Nor does it mean 48% of Germans support removing him.
Public expectations and constitutional political outcomes are different things.
The significance of the poll lies elsewhere.
When almost half of a country's surveyed population expects a Chancellor who has been in office for little more than a year not to survive another three months, confidence in the durability of the government has clearly deteriorated.
That can become politically consequential even if the prediction proves wrong.
Weak perceived authority can make coalition negotiations harder, encourage internal rivals, reduce party discipline and make difficult reforms harder to implement.
Political weakness can therefore become self-reinforcing.
Germany’s Problem Is Bigger Than One Chancellor
The deeper story may not ultimately be Friedrich Merz.
Germany is confronting a structural political problem.
Its traditional governing parties are losing support while the AfD has expanded significantly.
At the same time, the established parties continue to exclude the AfD from governing coalitions.
That means political fragmentation increases even when elections produce clear shifts in voter preference.
Changing the Chancellor would not automatically resolve that problem.
Nor would replacing one CDU leader necessarily resolve Germany's economic challenges, demographic pressures, industrial competitiveness problems, energy costs or disagreements over Russia and Ukraine.
A leadership change might alter political presentation.
The underlying structural pressures would remain.
Does This Affect New Zealand?
Germany matters far beyond Europe.
It is Europe's largest economy, a major NATO member and one of the central political forces within the European Union.
Political instability in Berlin can therefore influence European defence policy, sanctions, trade, energy strategy and support for Ukraine.
Those decisions can reach New Zealand indirectly through commodity prices, international trade, global energy markets and the broader security relationships connecting Europe with the Indo-Pacific.
There is also a more general democratic lesson.
Governments can maintain parliamentary majorities while losing public confidence.
Conversely, strong polling for opposition parties does not automatically translate into political power when coalition structures prevent those parties from entering government.
Germany is increasingly demonstrating the tension between those two realities.
For New Zealand, the useful question is not whether Friedrich Merz personally survives.
It is what happens when a substantial proportion of voters move away from established governing parties while the political system struggles to translate that change into governing arrangements.
Germany's next elections will provide another measure of that pressure.
But even if Merz remains Chancellor, the political conditions producing the current crisis will not disappear with one favourable result.
The YouGov poll is therefore better understood not as a prediction of Merz's departure, but as a measure of how rapidly confidence in Germany's existing political settlement is being tested.
Independent reporting. Original context. Credited sources.
Sources